Feed on
Posts
Comments

Creative Commons seems like a wonderfully “creative” and productive set of guidelines to structure the boundless potential that the internet unlocks for learning. Working through this week’s activity makes me realize the pressing need to instruct our teachers and students in proper use of intellectual property. Creative Commons makes so much available in an easily accesible format without any guilt or inhibition about legal and ethical use. There is a lot of uncertainty among adults about what’s OK and not OK to do with found material on the web.  As for students, the concept that intellectual property even EXISTS is new to them.

Creative Commons is one more example of the basic phenomenon I encounter at every turn as I wade into the web 2.0 pool:  if I can imagine something cool or important, someone else has already thought of it and put it into place.

I am VERY excited about wiki technology! In fact, before even fully working my way through the “thing 8″ activity, I launched my own classroom wiki with a fifth and sixth grade literature group. The wiki will enable the children to “publish” their reflective questions for the the rest of the class to see and comment on one another’s ideas before and between class sessions. Having run discussions with children at this age, I know how hard it is for kids to feel they get enough “air time” in the sharing of ideas and insights. How often have I seen a kid patiently holding his/her hand up only to be called on long after the initial spark has left?  What will it be like when kids can shoot these comments off to each other asynchronously, so waiting no longer becomes an issue? I’m eager to see.

Reading through the wikis I reviewed for this exercise gave me many concrete examples of what to do and what not to do. One of the things I noticed right away is that wikis can become cluttered, disorganized and hard to follow quite easily. I found this to be the case in more than one wiki, including this one here. Since they are not as linear or tied to templates as blogs, it appears as though careful thought about structure either before or during the use of the wiki will be time well spent. Since they can be changed on the fly, editing and restructuring can likely happen as new and better uses become apparent in the classroom.

I already noticed that I should change the structure of my class wiki to make the student’s weekly questions more dynamic and revisable. Rather than have them post answers to the “discussion” section as I instructed them to do this week, I will experiment with having each student author a new “page” which will be viewable by their classmates and revisable by each student. I will wait to see how this week’s work goes and suggest the change in class with them on Tuesday.  Can’t wait to see how this unfolds!

I especially liked the simplicity of these wikis: Primary Math and Code Blue.

I’ve found Google Reader to be a wonderful tool to consolidate and streamline my blog reading. That said, it’s still easy to let things pile up. As blogger Will Richardson says, though, “I don’t have enough time in the day” is the wrong answer. I love his concrete tips to managing an on-line reading habit. On a personal level, I need to work out a streamlined approach to getting the information I need from the best possible people out there.  Several of the blogs I initially signed up for have proven to be less useful than I had hoped so I have pruned and adjusted my settings accordingly. Useful blogs seem to fall into one of two categories for me.

1. Visionary authors who pull meaning together form disparate places, and

2. People who deftly select links of value and identify practical and helpful tools that I can use myself or pass along to others.

Peter Gow’s New Progressive blog would be an example of the former and Teachpaperless an example of the latter out of the blogs I’ve recently been following. Less helpful are long-winded discussions with little substance or extended compendiums of links of dubious real value. The trick for me will be to identify a suitable collection of inspirational and useful authors to read so that I can efficiently scan their work during a busy week.

As I worked through this activity, I experienced both one of the greatest benefits and the one of the greatest problems I need to overcome as a participant in a web 2.0 world.  The posts, links and comments were thought-provoking, engaging and useful. I also thoroughly enjoyed all that I learned through the blogs I visited. I love reading blogs, both inside and outside the education “beltway.” I am often left with that disorienting feeling you get working on an important project in a great library as you pick your head up from a book and wonder where all the time went. The problem is, it also took me a LONG time to get through the assignment.

The distractibility factor is HUGE in a non-linear, hypertext world! This particular task, for example, took me countless hours to “complete” because I am forever distracted by things both inside and outside of my intended purpose. For example, reading Dan’s post on homework, I am lured into reading his supplementary documents and then the comments on them so that I take a huge amount of time getting the original article read. On the upside, I learned some very interesting things. Ironically, though, I do not feel “finished.” Perhaps this is related to something Chris Betcher’s discussed in his blog post on digital natives and immigrants. Since we often move onto other things that catch our interest when we are working on something that requires linear, methodical work, we are sometimes left with uncompleted tasks. Following directions is about as linear as it gets. If we can’t work through linear processes, we can’t figure out how to set up a video game like the kid in Chris’ post.  On the other hand, in a linear world, we do not have the benefits of divergent thinking. In a web 2.0 environment, how do we determine when enough is enough? When do we stop and move on? I only have a finite amount of time in the day, and my mind wanders, in both productive and unproductive ways. This activity brought into focus the need I have to develop a better discipline or practice as a reader.

Stylistically, I love the informal nature of writing in a blog environment. Word processing revolutionized the writing experience for me with the easy ability to correct and revise drafts; a web 2.0 environment extends this to the next level by making it possible to revise and add even AFTER “publishing.” For example, I have revised the two initial posts I made to this new blog 3 or 4 times since originally publishing them. This can be a MAJOR help for kids and adults who fear the blank page and have trouble committing to a final draft.  Blogging also blurs the distinction between “authors” and readers” in amazing and productive ways. The back-and-forth between writers and readers in the blogs I read was very interesting and illustrate how authors are able to reiterate points to clarify, extend arguments to incorporate feedback and questions from readers, and readers themselves become writers for future readers to learn from.

Last night, my family watched a film that captures the blogging and traditional publishing beautifully. “Julie and Julia” is a story about a young woman who blogs about Julia Child. The film, set in the mid-1950s and 2002, creates a wonderful juxtaposition between the two worlds of publishing. Julia Child’s efforts to get her book published are arduous and involve years of revision, visiting publishers and using carbon paper, sending notes across the Atlantic. On the other hand, we have Julie, a young woman who fashioned herself a writer but who had been discouraged by publishers unable to finish her first novel. As a result, we find her at the start of the film in an unfulfilling job searching for meaning.  She creates a blog which becomes quite popular. She is ultimately was profiled in the New York Times, offered a book contract, a film deal, and ultimately read by Julia Child herself.

I can immediately identify several important take-aways from this week’s assignment that will find their way into my workweek next week either in my own planning or conversations with colleagues.

  1. Try using constraints to structure writing assignments rather than requirements. One of the best assignments I ever had as a writer was in graduate school where I was required every week to write a précis on a book that could be no longer than one page. We had to cover all of the salient aspects of the book including the author’s thesis, evidence used, etc. The document was copied and shared with the entire class. There was a public audience who NEEDED my work – it was to be used by them in the course and beyond.  It taught me to be precise and succinct in my writing. This teacher is no doubt using web 2.0 tools to meet these goals at this point, but this was in the very early days of the internet and wikis and blogs were not part of his tool kit.
  2. Use blogging to engage emerging readers and writers in the classroom and beyond. I am about to begin teaching a 5th and 6th grade book group and will find some way to let the conversations and writing assignments about our book spill out of our class periods and into a blog environment.
  3. Use podcasts and voice threads to enhance the way that kids can reflect on their learning  in SSR and beyond.

Now, enough already! It’s time to move on.

As I sat in my car parked outside a café with my laptop out with three “windows” open, my browser streaming the “Shift Happens” video, a word document at the ready and email in the background in case something “important” comes in, I realize how much has changed in the 10 year since I was last a full-time teacher. When I was teaching history, the internet was still pretty new in the classroom and still used primarily for research. It was definitely a web 1.0 environment. We spent a lot of time discussing how to keep kids from viewing pornography. Since then, we have watched a total transformation in technology. My 13-year old daughter now sits much like I am now, with at least two things if not three or four going on simultaneously. It has become a major frustration when the computer is not able to respond as fast as we think. One of the biggest laughs at a film I saw this past year came from the audience when the sound of a “dial-up” connection burst from the screen. We’ve become accustomed to instant communication; to interacting with and relating to others through blogs, wikis, Nings and websites.

What does this mean for teaching and learning? Schools have ironically been places where we have too often asked kids to slow their learning down to stay with the group. Web 2.0 tools help us explore truly amazing ways to differentiate instruction. Why do kids to slow down? How can we have them both “sing in the choir” and soar with the eagles? As an administrator, I need to think simultaneously about how web 2.0 tools can improve the experience of school for students, parents, teachers and administrators simultaneously. It’s daunting some days, but terribly exciting as well. One of the major goals I have for myself in this course is to figure out how to harness some of the amazing web 2.0 tools our faculty and others are using with children to plan and communicate as adults.

Lifelong learning is really learning for life. As a high school senior, I was given the opportunity to select a few pithy quotes to place on page in the yearbook. Like most kids at the time, I thought about what I had been reading and what seemed to touch a chord not just about the moment, but about all that lay before me and my classmates as we head out into the unknown. I chose a line from the book Apology for Wonder by Sam Keen in which he examines the concept of wonder and the spirit of childhood and the influence both of the can have on our path through life if we let them. He writes: “reality is a gift, a delight, a surprise, in fact a toy; it is an excessive superabundant cafeteria of delights, and should an experience begin to be jaded by boredom and staleness all one has to do is move on to the next.” I believed that at 18 and actually, I still think it’s true.  Perhaps it’s why I am called to the field of education. Sadly few schools these days seem to be designed around the goal of nurturing the spirit of wonder in children, let alone adults.  Fortunately, I happen to work in one with these goals embedded in its mission.

There’s no reason to be bored for very long. Fear of failure usually holds us back from taking that first step into the unknown, yet in taking that first step, we quickly realize what it is we need to learn in order to be successful. This transitional space is, in fact, a liminal zone where profound learning and growth can happen. Each of the “seven and a half habits of effective lifelong learning” are important to bear in mind as we plan for our own learning and the growth of those with whom we work. The more we model and experience the risk-taking required of true learning as adults, the stronger our schools will be for the students we serve.